summertime_chic

Updated 1 day ago

Johnny Was Eyelet Embroidered Floral Tank Slit Dress

Name: Johnny Was Eyelet Embroidered Floral Tank Slit Dress
Brand: Johnny Was
SKU: 66482e8edc8a4e9039fe0d27
Price: 66.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Johnny Was

$66 $348

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $16.50 with . Learn More .

Size

This item is sold

Like and save for later

• sleeveless • pull-over style • lace crochet appliqués w/ intricate embroidered floral • Adjustable straps • Side slits at hem • relaxed fit / Shift silhouette • 100% Cupra Rayon (feels like silk) ✨ 👉🏼NO slip underneath, thin see-through fabric; could be used as a cover-up or put a black cami under! PTP: 24” Length (approx): 41” Excellent Preowned Condition 📦 FAST Shipping! | 5 ⭐️ Rated Seller | Reasonable Offers welcome

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 3+ Bundle
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

mpsadler62 and 3 others like this

5 Comments

mpsadler62 Are there any flaws? I just want to make sure it’s black on black embroidery and lace?

4 days agoReply

summertime_chic @mpsadler62 I believe it is black on black sometimes when a black color is on certain fabrics or in various lighting, it can look like almost navy. This is a very rare piece so I couldn’t say 100% for sure but to me in normal lighting it looks black.

4 days agoReply

summertime_chic There are no holes/stains that I could find, I check every piece thoroughly before posting & shipping, but I do my best to ensure an accurate description, but if someone were to find anything wrong, we’re human and may miss tiny things.

4 days agoReply

mpsadler62 @summertime_chic In pictures 3 & 11 it looks navy but the other pictures look black. I’d really like to know if it is black or navy.

4 days agoReply

summertime_chic @mpsadler62 it’s black on black. When I researched it from sites, there was no indication of a different color other than black. Just be advised, black can reflect differently on various textures and lighting.

4 days agoReply