bluepoppyart

Updated 4 days ago

Vintage 1970’s Peaches & Cream Wedding Gown XS

Name: Vintage 1970’s Peaches & Cream Wedding Gown XS
Brand: Vintage
SKU: 5fa9a3f5bcdb2feba2ac33e1
Price: 275.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Vintage

$275

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $68.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Vintage 1970’s Peaches & Cream Wedding Gown XS XS/ 0 fit. Perfect like new condition, no flaws. Waist 13” across laying flat Pit to pit 15.5” Length 55” Sheer high neck and long sleeves, faux pearl closures at wrists and neck, complete with separate price matching petticoat

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 20% off 2+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 21%
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

madisonstart and 167 others like this

8 Comments

u0696700 Wow! This is gorgeous! I would get rid of the sleeves to help modernize it but other than that, I wouldn’t change a thing! Nice find!

Nov 27Reply

bluepoppyart @u0696700 thanks! Yeah that would be a cool modification for sure. Love your pieces!

Nov 27Reply

u0696700 Awe thanks! They were my great-great grandmother’s. My sister doesn’t wear jewelry, so I took them.

Nov 27Reply

bluepoppyart @u0696700 guess you aren’t wearing them either :) lol just kidding. Happy Tday!

Nov 27Reply

terribelle12 Measurements please! This is a stunning gown! Who can fit those waists though? I’m 24” and not even close I’m sure!

Aug 01Reply

bluepoppyart @terribelle12 thanks for reminding me! I completely forgot to post measurements on this! I will get those measurements posted ASAP and message you. But I do think that a 24 inch waist would be perfect, I don’t think the dress is smaller than a 24 inch waist.

Aug 01Reply

bluepoppyart @terribelle12 this was the wedding dress of a friend of mine, her wedding was at least 40 years ago, she was very petite but I can’t imagine that her Waist was smaller than a 24 inch. But I’ll get those measurements posted

Aug 01Reply

bluepoppyart @terribelle12 Hi I just posted the measurements.

Aug 03Reply