Dior Trotter Vintage Handbag

Name: Dior Trotter Vintage Handbag
Brand: Dior
SKU: 682a8934b09b7c7b9e642bf8
Price: 435.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Dior

$435

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $108.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

This authentic Dior handbag has endured the test of time! Classic bag with adjustable strap with snaps to stay in place. Navy leather strap and corners have been painted/polished to improve appearance. No cracking, peeling or tears inside. Side two-toned hardware unscrews on each side to remove completely-therefore making slouchy clutch or cosmetic bag style. Tarnish on hardware due to age and fabric wearing on corners by hardware. The luxurious design reflects Dior's commitment to quality and sophistication. Dimensions: 11”W x 7”H x 5” D. Comes with branded dust-bag and COA.

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

Price Dropped: 10%
$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

tashianiicole and 39 others like this

9 Comments

tarynt77 Hi! Could you add a few more pics of the inside please?

May 23Reply

valora_starr @tarynt77 Hi! Yes, I added some other photos and the COA. Thanks for inquiring.

May 23Reply

tarynt77 @valora_starr thanks! So is the wear mainly on the hardware?

May 23Reply

valora_starr @tarynt77 yes, the hardware is very vintage but so unique. No rips, tears or stains on fabric. The leather may have minimal scratches but overall due to age it’s so great!

May 23Reply

valora_starr Tag inside is worn down and partially removed due to wear, yet still indicates made in France and scotchguard.

May 24Reply

tarynt77 @valora_starr thanks! Dows the zipper kinda of zig zag on the top or to straight across? Also do you know the year? Thanks so much

May 24Reply

valora_starr @tarynt77 It is straight across-I added a photo too.

May 24Reply

valora_starr @tarynt77 I do not know the year. It is very rare to find. I did research to find Trotter pattern came out in the 1960’s.

May 24Reply

tarynt77 @valora_starr ok thanks so much!

May 24Reply